’83’ : A MOVIE REVIEW

~:: Guest Post ::~

If revenge dining amd revenge travelling are the new buzzwords, revenge entertaining cannot be far behind and when it comes to entertainment in India, Bollywood and cricket arre the names that make the game. The effort to marry the two through movies is not new but the effects on the audience has always been different.

83 is another ambitious attempt to cash in on the two never dying demand sources of entertainment. Like any other movie, a movie on sports can also be based on facts or fiction. Director Kabir Khan decided to bat first on a green top wicket with windy conditions. A disaster from the word go. The biggest error in judgement of conditions is equivalent to an error in conceptualization of a movie before it is ready for production. If he had done a little homework, he would have known that the chances of succeding in a movie in a sports theme were more ,if it is either a fact based movie on an individual or a fiction based movie on an event. Kabir Khan did just the opposite. He chose the wrong combination of a fact based movie on an event.

Obviously, it needed a lot of research work and interviews of every individual associated with the event finally leading up to the victory to help build a string misc-en-scene. It was clearly not done. The result is a stroke less script that cannot get many runs in the box office. Bringing politics and border warfare and creating the scenes were unncessary deviations from the script crying for substance.The poor screenplay is sufficient to show the pathetic prepartion done in collecting information amd stories.

With a weak script it was now left to the other technical teams to give their best. Unfortunately, it was miserable in all machineries of production. The Art director generally rises up to the challenge on movies based on historical periods. Sadly, nothing in the sets,both outdoors and indoors gave the feeling of 83, other than the overused rotary dialer phone, rooftop tv antenna, the black and white tv sets and a heap of files on a table in the cricket board office in the opening scene. These are props used by nursery children in fancy competitions and celebrations.

With more than half of the movies covering actions on the field, the sports action director had more than a lot of role to play. He did a fairly good job in the batting actions of Viv Richards and bowling actions of a few Indian bowlers , particularly Kapil Dev. It’s here that Ranveer Singh’s hard work has really showed in his acting and actions and brilliantly picking up Kapil’s English accent. But without a good script and dialogues, a good actor can only go so far and no further. Pankaj Tripathy was impeccable as usual but Deepika Padukone was a waste.

Since success was eluding Kabir Khan for a long time since Bajrangi Bhaijaan, he has desparately tried to add a few successful characters and replicate a few emotional scenes from his previous movie for example, a large crowd swayed away by common emotions. The echoing voice of a child screaming and superseding the voice of the crowd, etc. But clips and cuts pasted on a new work make it look patchy and not perfect.

One of the most awaited movie releases on the big screen during the pandemic has left the audience, particularly the cricket lovers, definitely disappointed.

Guest post:

Contributed by Suvendu Sahoo